Hospitals Look to Health Law, Cutting Charity
From The New York Times:
In St. Louis, Barnes-Jewish Hospital has started charging co-payments to uninsured patients, no matter how poor they are. The Southern New Hampshire Medical Center in Nashua no longer provides free care for most uninsured patients who are above the federal poverty line — $11,670 for an individual. And in Burlington, Vt., Fletcher Allen Health Care has reduced financial aid for uninsured patients who earn between twice and four times the poverty level.
Hospital systems around the country have
started scaling back financial assistance for lower- and middle-income people
without health insurance, hoping to push them into signing up for coverage
through the new online marketplaces created under the Affordable Care Act.
The trend is troubling to advocates for the
uninsured, who say raising fees will inevitably cause some to skip care rather
than buy insurance that they consider unaffordable. Though the number of
hospitals tightening access to free or discounted care appears limited so far,
many say they are considering doing so, and experts predict that stricter
policies will become increasingly common.
Driving the new policies is the cost of charity
care, which is partly covered by government but remains a burden for many
hospitals. The new law also reduces federal aid to hospitals that treat large
numbers of poor and uninsured people, creating an additional pressure on some to
restrict charity care.
In St. Louis, Barnes-Jewish Hospital has started charging co-payments to uninsured patients, no matter how poor they are. The Southern New Hampshire Medical Center in Nashua no longer provides free care for most uninsured patients who are above the federal poverty line — $11,670 for an individual. And in Burlington, Vt., Fletcher Allen Health Care has reduced financial aid for uninsured patients who earn between twice and four times the poverty level.
By tightening requirements for charity care,
hospital executives say, they hope to encourage eligible people to obtain
low-cost insurance through the subsidized private plans now available under the
law.
“Do we allow our charity care programs to kick
in if people are unwilling to sign up?” said Nancy M. Schlichting, chief
executive of the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit. “Our inclination is to say
we will not, because it just seems that that defeats the purpose of what the
Affordable Care Act has put in place.”
In the past, Southern New Hampshire Medical
Center generally provided free or discounted care for patients who were at or
below 225 percent of the poverty level, or about $26,260 for an individual. But
starting this year, only patients below the poverty level will receive such
charity care, said Paul Trainor, the system’s vice president of finance.
Patients “who refuse to purchase federally
mandated health insurance when they are eligible to do so will not be awarded
charitable care,” the hospital’s revised policy states.
The financial challenges are particularly
daunting in the more than 24 states that have not yet expanded Medicaid,
including Missouri. The Affordable Care Act reduces federal aid for
uncompensated care on the assumption that hospitals would replace much of the
lost income with payments for patients newly covered by Medicaid.
But the Supreme Court in 2012 gave states the
right to opt out of the expansion. Now hospitals that treat the poor and
uninsured in states like Missouri are losing federal aid without getting new
Medicaid payments, a problem they say is threatening their bottom lines. Robert
Hughes, the president and chief executive of the Missouri Foundation for Health,
an independent philanthropic group, said BJC HealthCare was “in a tough spot”
because of the state’s refusal to expand Medicaid.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home