States Are Focus of Effort to Foil Health Care Law - Expanding Medicaid is critical to the law’s goal of covering the nation’s 48 million uninsured. Hospitals and insurers were also counting on more Medicaid patients to make the economics of the law work.
From The New York Times:
The federal government is again open for business, and Republicans in Washington are licking their wounds from the failed Tea Party attempt to derail President Obama’s health care overhaul. But here in Virginia’s capital, conservative activists are pursuing a hardball campaign as they chart an alternative path to undoing “Obamacare” — through the states.
The federal government is again open for business, and Republicans in Washington are licking their wounds from the failed Tea Party attempt to derail President Obama’s health care overhaul. But here in Virginia’s capital, conservative activists are pursuing a hardball campaign as they chart an alternative path to undoing “Obamacare” — through the states.
“This has been one of those trench warfare kind of
efforts for a year now, and I think it is one of those hidden stories of the
whole fight against Obamacare,” said Tim Phillips, president of Americans for
Prosperity. “It’s not flashy; it’s just in a whole bunch of state capitals and
in the districts of a whole lot of state legislators, but it’s such a crucial
aspect of the overall long-term effort to roll back Obamacare.”
The state-by-state strategy represents a split from
the course pursued by Heritage Action for America and its sister organization,
Heritage Foundation, which drove the “defunding Obamacare” movement that led to
the recent government shutdown. In an
opinion article published Friday by The Wall Street Journal, Jim DeMint, the
foundation president, made no apologies. “Obamacare will now be the issue for
the next few years,” he wrote.
Expanding Medicaid, a joint federal-state program for
the poor, is critical to the law’s goal of covering the nation’s 48 million
uninsured. Hospitals and insurers were also counting on more Medicaid patients
to make the economics of the law work. For states, the terms seemed attractive:
The federal government would pay 100 percent of the cost of new enrollees for
the first three years, 90 percent after that.
But in June 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that states
could opt out of Medicaid expansion. The ruling opened the door for conservative
opponents of the law. Americans for Prosperity, with paid staff members in 34
states, walked through it. So did another group, Tea Party Patriots, which
recently gave $20,000 to organizers of a referendum drive to put the question of
Medicaid expansion on the Arizona ballot.
Americans for Prosperity has spent millions in states
around the country, including Arkansas, Florida, Ohio, Louisiana, Michigan and
Pennsylvania, to run the kind of aggressive campaign that it is now waging here
in Virginia, where much will depend on the governor’s race. The Democratic
candidate, Terry McAuliffe, who leads in the polls, favors expansion. The
Republican candidate, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, is opposed.
So far roughly half the states are moving forward with Medicaid expansion, and
an increasing number of Republican governors are expressing interest. Michigan,
where Gov. Rick Snyder recently signed Medicaid expansion legislation into law,
was “a tough loss,” Mr. Phillips conceded. In Ohio, Gov. John R. Kasich wants to
expand. So does Gov. Tom Corbett in Pennsylvania, even though the legislature
has already rejected it.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home