Many in G.O.P. Offer Theory: Default Wouldn’t Be That Bad
From The New York Times:
Senator Richard Burr, Republican of North Carolina, a reliable friend of business on Capitol Hill and no one’s idea of a bomb thrower, isn’t buying the apocalyptic warnings that a default on United States government debt would lead to a global economic cataclysm.
Senator Richard Burr, Republican of North Carolina, a reliable friend of business on Capitol Hill and no one’s idea of a bomb thrower, isn’t buying the apocalyptic warnings that a default on United States government debt would lead to a global economic cataclysm.
“We always have enough money to pay our debt service,”
said Mr. Burr, who pointed to a stream of tax revenue flowing into the Treasury
as he shrugged off fears of a cascading financial crisis. “You’ve had the
federal government out of work for close to two weeks; that’s about $24 billion
a month. Every month, you have enough saved in salaries alone that you’re
covering three-fifths, four-fifths of the total debt service, about $35 billion
a month. That’s manageable for some time.”
As President Obama steps up his declarations about the
dire consequences of not raising the debt
limit, increasing numbers of Congressional Republicans are disputing that
forecast, as well as the timing of when the Treasury might run out of money and
the implications of a default, further complicating the negotiating situation
for both Mr. Obama and Speaker John
A. Boehner, who must find a way out of the impasse.
Both men were counting on the prospect of a global
economic meltdown to help pull restive Republicans into line. On Wall Street,
among business leaders and in a vast majority of university economics
departments, the threat of significant instability resulting from a debt default
is not in question. But a lot of Republicans simply do not believe it.
A surprisingly broad section of the Republican
Party is convinced that a threat once taken as economic fact may not exist —
or at least may not be so serious. Some question the Treasury’s drop-dead
deadline of Oct. 17. Some government services might have to be curtailed, they
concede. “But I think the real date, candidly, the date that’s highly
problematic for our nation, is Nov. 1,” said Senator Bob Corker, Republican of
Tennessee.
Others say there is no deadline at all — that daily
tax receipts would be more than enough to pay off Treasury
bonds as they come due.
“It really is irresponsible of the president to try to
scare the markets,” said Senator Rand
Paul, Republican of Kentucky. “If you don’t raise your debt ceiling, all
you’re saying is, ‘We’re going to be balancing our budget.’ So if you put it in
those terms, all these scary terms of, ‘Oh my goodness, the world’s going to
end’ — if we balance the budget, the world’s going to end? Why don’t we spend
what comes in?”
“If you propose it that way,” he said of not raising
the debt limit, “the American public will say that sounds like a pretty
reasonable idea.”
In a news conference, Mr. Obama said repeatedly that
those who doubted the repercussions of a default were making a huge mistake.
“When I hear people trying to downplay the
consequences of that, I think that’s really irresponsible, and I’m happy to talk
to any of them individually and walk them through exactly why it’s
irresponsible,” he said. “And it’s particularly funny coming from Republicans
who claim to be champions of business. There’s no business person out here who
thinks this wouldn’t be a big deal, not one. You go to anywhere from Wall Street
to Main Street, and you ask a C.E.O. of a company or ask a small-business person
whether it’d be a big deal if the United States government isn’t paying its
bills on time. They’ll tell you it’s a big deal. It would hurt.”
The turmoil created by the partial shutdown of the
federal government has already sent investors fleeing from stocks to the safe
harbor of Treasury bonds, long considered the safest investment on earth because
the full faith and credit of the United States government has never been
questioned. If that safe harbor is undermined, most economists have said loudly
and repeatedly, the impact could be catastrophic.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National
Association of Manufacturers, both bastions of Republican support, sent letters
to Congress on Tuesday urging action on the debt ceiling.
“Our nation has never defaulted in the past, and
failing to raise the debt limit in a timely fashion will seriously disrupt our
fragile economy and have a ripple effect throughout the world,” wrote Jay
Timmons, the president of the manufacturers’ group.
Some Republicans trust such warnings.
“Unlike some of my colleagues, I’ve been told by too
many people in the financial business that there will be reactions in the
market,” said Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona. “Of course I’m
worried.”
But the voices of denial are loud and persistent, with
some Republicans saying that the fallout from the continuing shutdown and the
automatic, across-the-board budget cuts known as sequestration has been less
severe than predicted.
Mr. Paul acknowledged that some economists disagreed
with him, but said others agreed. Peter Morici, a conservative economist and a
frequent guest on Fox Business, dashed off a column on Tuesday in which he
argued that “House Republicans, by refusing to raise the debt ceiling until they
obtain budget reforms, may be the country’s last hope to avoid a financial
ruin.”
Congressional Republicans have varied arguments. To
Representative Paul Broun, Republican of Georgia and a candidate for the Senate,
it is a question of ranking the evils.
“There are a lot of things that are going to affect
our economy,” he said. “The greatest threat right now is Obamacare. It’s already
destroyed jobs, it’s already destroyed our economy, and if it stays in place as
it is now, it’s going to destroy America.”
Representative Ted Yoho, a freshman Florida Republican
who had no experience in elective office before this year, said the largest
economy on earth should learn from his large-animal veterinary practice.
“Everybody talks about how destabilizing doing this
will be on the markets,” he said. “And you’ll see that initially, but heck, I’ve
seen that in my business. When you go through that, and you address the problem
and you address your creditors and say, ‘Listen, we’re going to pay you. We’re
just not going to pay you today, but we’re going to pay you with interest, and
we will pay everybody that’s due money’ — if you did that, the world would say
America is finally addressing their problem.”
Representative Justin Amash, Republican of Michigan
and a leader of the House’s libertarian wing, said: “There’s no way to default
on Oct. 17. We will have enough money to make interest payments. The issue is,
how do we restructure our government so we don’t have to keep hitting the debt
ceiling?”
And while Representative Trent Franks, Republican of
Arizona, conceded that a government that could no longer borrow money would have
to curtail some of its contracting, he said Democrats should not get carried
away.
“It’s like everything else here,” he said. “People on
both sides of every argument seem to employ hyperbole when they could just state
the truth and it would still be of significant consequence.”
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home