Despite Bush’s Promises, Georgians Remain Skeptical About Immigration Bill
From The New York Times:
If President Bush thought he could win support for a comprehensive immigration bill by promising to secure the border and step up law enforcement, he would be dismayed by the reaction here.
“It’s all window dressing,” said Mark A. Johnson, a real estate lawyer in this fast-growing suburb of Atlanta. “We don’t believe the government has the will to enforce any of these promises. Everybody can see the folly of it, everybody but the politicians.”
The storm raging around the bill shows no sign of abating despite reassuring presidential words about strengthening border security.
Reagan W. Dean, a Georgia state employee, said: “Maybe it is possible to secure the border. Maybe it is possible to establish an employee identification system. But I don’t have any confidence that it will be done.”
“It really upsets me to find out that my government says, ‘Yes, we can secure the border, we can detain illegal aliens, we can take all sorts of actions to enforce the law, but we will do so only if Congress provides legal status to those who are here illegally,’ ” Mr. Dean said.
Louis S. Hunter, a pollster and political analyst based in Atlanta, said, “Congress and the president are completely out of touch with how people here feel about illegal immigration.”
Jane V. Kidd, chairwoman of the Democratic Party of Georgia, said: “This is not a partisan issue in Georgia. A small percentage of Democrats are supporting the bill as it stands, but a majority of Democrats and Republicans in the state do not like it.”
Mr. Dean, the state employee, . . . said: “. . . I frankly see this legislation as assisted suicide, for America, for the Republican Party and for all the individual politicians who support it.”
People here say they believe that Mr. Isakson, a resident of Marietta, shares their concerns. More than a year ago he insisted on “border security first,” as a prerequisite to “any immigration reform.”
If President Bush thought he could win support for a comprehensive immigration bill by promising to secure the border and step up law enforcement, he would be dismayed by the reaction here.
“It’s all window dressing,” said Mark A. Johnson, a real estate lawyer in this fast-growing suburb of Atlanta. “We don’t believe the government has the will to enforce any of these promises. Everybody can see the folly of it, everybody but the politicians.”
The storm raging around the bill shows no sign of abating despite reassuring presidential words about strengthening border security.
Reagan W. Dean, a Georgia state employee, said: “Maybe it is possible to secure the border. Maybe it is possible to establish an employee identification system. But I don’t have any confidence that it will be done.”
“It really upsets me to find out that my government says, ‘Yes, we can secure the border, we can detain illegal aliens, we can take all sorts of actions to enforce the law, but we will do so only if Congress provides legal status to those who are here illegally,’ ” Mr. Dean said.
Louis S. Hunter, a pollster and political analyst based in Atlanta, said, “Congress and the president are completely out of touch with how people here feel about illegal immigration.”
Jane V. Kidd, chairwoman of the Democratic Party of Georgia, said: “This is not a partisan issue in Georgia. A small percentage of Democrats are supporting the bill as it stands, but a majority of Democrats and Republicans in the state do not like it.”
Mr. Dean, the state employee, . . . said: “. . . I frankly see this legislation as assisted suicide, for America, for the Republican Party and for all the individual politicians who support it.”
People here say they believe that Mr. Isakson, a resident of Marietta, shares their concerns. More than a year ago he insisted on “border security first,” as a prerequisite to “any immigration reform.”
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home