By 2020, the United States will overtake Saudi Arabia as the world’s largest oil producer, according to the International Energy Agency. The U.S. has already overtaken Russia as the world’s leading gas producer. Fuel has become America’s largest export item.
David Brooks writes in The New York Times:
Joel Kotkin identified America’s epicenters of economic dynamism in a study for the Manhattan Institute. It is like a giant arc of unfashionableness. You start at the Dakotas where unemployment rates are at microscopic levels. You drop straight down through the energy belts of the Great Plains until you hit Texas. Occasionally, you turn to touch the spots where fertilizer output and other manufacturing plants are on the rebound, like the Third Coast areas in Louisiana, Mississippi and Northern Florida.
[T]he anonymous drudges at American farming
corporations are exporting $135 billion worth of products every year and
transforming the American Midwest. The unfashionable executive at petrochemical
companies have been uprooting plants from places like Chile, relocating them to
places like Louisiana, transforming economic prospects in the Southeast. Most
important of all, the boring old oil and gas engineers have transformed the
global balance of power.
By 2020, the United States will overtake Saudi Arabia
as the world’s largest oil producer, according to the International Energy
Agency. The U.S. has already overtaken Russia as the world’s leading gas
producer. Fuel has become America’s largest export item. Within five years,
according to a study by Citigroup, North America could be energy independent.
“OPEC will find it challenging to survive another 60 years, let alone another
decade,” Edward Morse, Citigroup’s researcher, told CNBC.
Joel Kotkin identified America’s epicenters of economic dynamism in a study for the Manhattan Institute. It is like a giant arc of unfashionableness. You start at the Dakotas where unemployment rates are at microscopic levels. You drop straight down through the energy belts of the Great Plains until you hit Texas. Occasionally, you turn to touch the spots where fertilizer output and other manufacturing plants are on the rebound, like the Third Coast areas in Louisiana, Mississippi and Northern Florida.
Vanity Fair still ranks the tech and media moguls and
calls it The New Establishment, but, as Kotkin notes, the big winners in the
current economy are the “Material Boys” — the people who grow grain, drill for
fuel and lay pipeline. The growing parts of the world, meanwhile, are often the
commodity belts, resource-rich places with good rule of law like Canada, Norway
and Australia.
Daniel Yergin, an energy guru, noted in Congressional
testimony last month that the revolution in oil and gas extraction has led to
1.7 million new jobs in the United States alone, a number that could rise to
three million by 2020. The shale revolution added $62 billion to federal
revenues in 2012. At the same time, carbon-dioxide emissions are down 13 percent
since 2007, as gas is used instead of coal to generate electricity.
Most of us have grown up in a world in which we
assumed that energy was scarce, or even running out. We could now be entering a
world of relatively cheap energy abundance.
Most of us have grown up in a world in which oil
states in the Middle East could throw their weight around because of their grip
on the economy’s life source. But the power of petro-states is on the wane.
Yergin argues that the oil sanctions against Iran may not have been sustainable
if not for the new alternate sources of supply.
We’ve grown accustomed to despotic regimes in Russia
and Venezuela that live off oil and gas wealth. But those regimes are facing
hard times, too. Gazprom is already offering roughly 10 percent discounts on
existing contracts. The Nigerians and Venezuelans may find it hard to compete.
People in China and elsewhere are wondering if the fracking revolution means
that the 21st century will be another North American century, just like the last
one.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home