.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Cracker Squire

THE MUSINGS OF A TRADITIONAL SOUTHERN DEMOCRAT

My Photo
Name:
Location: Douglas, Coffee Co., The Other Georgia, United States

Sid in his law office where he sits when meeting with clients. Observant eyes will notice the statuette of one of Sid's favorite Democrats.

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

The center holds -- Many Democratic politicians privately detest the netroots’ self-righteousness and bullying.

David Brooks writes in The New York Times writes about the bloggers, billionaires and activists on the left who make up the “netroots”:

[T]he netroots emerged in part in rebellion against Clintonian politics. They wanted bold colors and slashing attacks. They didn’t want their politicians catering to what Markos Moulitsas Zúniga of the Daily Kos calls “the mythical middle.”

[W]hile Republicans can win by appealing only to conservatives, Democrats must appeal to centrists as well as liberals.

The fact is, many Democratic politicians privately detest the netroots’ self-righteousness and bullying. They also know their party has a historic opportunity to pick up disaffected Republicans and moderates, so long as they don’t blow it by drifting into cuckoo land. They also know that a Democratic president is going to face challenges from Iran and elsewhere that are going to require hard-line, hawkish responses.

Finally, these Democrats understand their victory formula is not brain surgery. You have to be moderate on social issues, activist but not statist on domestic issues and hawkish on foreign policy. This time they’re not going to self-destructively deviate from that.

Both liberals and Republicans have an interest in exaggerating the netroots’ influence, but in reality that influence is surprisingly marginal, even among candidates for whom you’d think it would be strong.

1 Comments:

Blogger Dana said...

Rule Number One.

No party should take strategic advice from the other side's concern trolls.

I'm sorry you haven't noticed polls showing Netroots stands are favored by margins of from 3-2 to 2-1 by the general public.

Change has happened and you want to play by the 2002 rules? Who are these "disaffected Republicans and moderates" who will be with you if you just say "sir may I have another" and thus are worth fighting for? They no longer exist. If they ever did.

For more -- http://www.danablankenhorn.com/2007/10/dramas.html

1:34 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home