Perdue didn’t propose very much in the way of policy initiatives during his first term in office & he will accomplish even less during his second term
Tom Crawford writes in Capitol Impact:
Start with the fact that Perdue is basically a lame-duck governor, while several prominent legislators and congressmen are already setting up their campaigns to replace him in the 2010 elections. Perdue didn’t propose very much in the way of policy initiatives during his first term in office and he will accomplish even less during his second term as House Speaker Glenn Richardson and Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle start jockeying for position in the next governor’s race.
You can expect Richardson and Cagle to emphasize their own issues and pay scant attention to any of the governor’s ideas. That won’t sit well with Perdue, who seethes with anger whenever he thinks anyone is questioning his prerogatives as the state’s chief executive. As soon as the governor figures out that legislators are ignoring him, he’ll go off like an improvised explosive device and cause collateral damage all over the capitol.
Start with the fact that Perdue is basically a lame-duck governor, while several prominent legislators and congressmen are already setting up their campaigns to replace him in the 2010 elections. Perdue didn’t propose very much in the way of policy initiatives during his first term in office and he will accomplish even less during his second term as House Speaker Glenn Richardson and Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle start jockeying for position in the next governor’s race.
You can expect Richardson and Cagle to emphasize their own issues and pay scant attention to any of the governor’s ideas. That won’t sit well with Perdue, who seethes with anger whenever he thinks anyone is questioning his prerogatives as the state’s chief executive. As soon as the governor figures out that legislators are ignoring him, he’ll go off like an improvised explosive device and cause collateral damage all over the capitol.
posted by Sid Cottingham | 8:03 PM
2 Comments:
Why can't something be done about the utility companies charging late fees on retired citizins bills? Most of these peoples checks come two or three days after there bills and are charged outragous late fees,which have to come out of there allready too small checks,and on top of that it kills there credit.They have no control of when there checks come.I and several others believe that there should be no late fees charged to anyone over 65 years of age.for example:When you take a $25.00 late fee out of a $600.00 check,for 3 different utilities, that's $75.00 that they could have spent on food. Most retired peoples checks come thesecond wed. of the month and there utilities are due before that. I hope someone ot there reading this can get this to the proper people for discussion.Thanks for your time,Sincerely,Terresa G. Bowen 498 McMurray Lake Rd. toccoa,Ga.30577
Hey man, was just browsing through the internet looking for some information and came across your blog.
I am impressed by the information that you have on this blog. how to get him to propose
Post a Comment
<< Home